
Homecoming 2005
We’ve made some progress on our path to recolonization!
SOMETHING NEW ... to capture and share your input, ideas, feelings, etc. on possible recolonization, we have added a new area to our Web site to post your thoughts. Please let us know what you’re thinking by going to Recolonization Thoughts Page, fill in and email your ideas.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
>Fraters, >Guess what came in the mail this week? A TEKE Magazine. First one I've received in years.
>Page 5 indicates 241 active chapters and 26 active colonies.
>Delta Tau Delta looks to add 6 or 7 new chapters over the next 3-4 years.
>Sigma Chi - 214 chapters in the US and Canada. Founded 1855.
>Alpha Tau Omega - Founded 1865.
>Kappa Sigma (our founding national fraternity before TKE) >It almost looks as though we should possibly take a look at our roots. KS looks stronger than possibly TKE right now. TKE is still huge and I don't understand the College's opinion that it's not as strong as some other Nationals on campus. The numbers clearly state that TKE's still a much larger national than everyone but possibly the SC's. >Just thought this might have some influence on our decisions.
>Best regards, |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This was sent to me by Charlie Long...... College suspends Delta Tau Delta
By John Davidson Although a membership review by the fraternity's national office is underway, it is unclear if the second-oldest Delta Tau Delta chapter in the country will be reconstituted at all. Garth Eberhart, assistant executive vice president of Delta Tau Delta International, said letters regarding the fraternity's future are being sent to members this week and a public announcement will be made next week. Dean of Men Aaron Petersen said the college and the fraternity's national office made the decision to suspend the chapter in the spring after they confirmed reports of physical hazing during one the fraternity's pledgeship activities. During a 24-hour period last spring, the administration learned of a series of incidents that involved kidnappings, public disturbances, physical injuries, a car accident and the use of an electronic taser gun. Provost Bob Blackstock said that although the college had no choice but to suspend the house after these incidents were confirmed, the administration has been dealing with problems in the house for years. "What they did, the events leading up to their suspension, that was not the first time that had happened," President Larry Arnn said. "Some things happened in that fraternity which were dangerous and wrong." And controversy over the house began long before the chapter's suspension in April. The college imposed a series of rules and restrictions on the fraternity throughout the school year, including mandatory weekday and weekend quiet hours, restricted access to the house kitchen, alumni supervision of all pledge activities, rules against swearing and smoking in the house and a moratorium on house parties. In an interview with the Collegian, the members of the then-executive board of the fraternity said their troubles began in October 2002 when the college hired Lydia Esten as the fraternity's new house director. Board members said Esten interfered with the life of the house and exercised a greater direct involvement in day-to-day activities than previous house directors had. "She interfered with our rituals and got the dean involved in them, which she was not supposed to do," said Ross Haan, president of the DTD executive board. "The position the dean wanted her to fill was not the position we interviewed for."
Petersen denied these charges and said there was not a change in the job description for house director. The new rules, Petersen said, were introduced as a result of disruptive behavior, episodic disturbances and repeated physical damage to the house throughout the fall semester of 2002. The house was fined and put on probation for the last week of the semester.
Esten, who declined to comment, worked with Petersen and DTD alumni over winter break to formulate a set of temporary house rules for the remainder of the year. When members returned in January, the alumni informed them of the new rules. By the end of March house members felt that the new rules and guidelines were not working. The house had been unable to proceed with their pledgeship activities on schedule and had only one pledge activity all year. Just before Spring Break another incident, unrelated to pledgeship, resulted in the suspension of a member until the end of the semester and heavy fines for the house.
"That was the last straw," former executive board member John Paulun said. "We couldn't allow members to be arbitrarily kicked out via letter with no deliberations and no consultation. The penalties were not fitting the written guidelines."
"As vice president of the house I had no say whatsoever except to hand out fines that the dean would give me," Harrell said. "We all decided, since we couldn't do our jobs, that something we could do that would make the administration see that this was a serious problem was to write a letter to the Collegian and resign."
But Petersen said there was not a satisfactory effort from the house to follow the new rules and work with the administration.
The executive board's letter of resignation appeared on the editorial page of the April 3 issue of the Collegian, and laid out the house's grievance with Petersen and Esten: The administration immediately took issue with the tone and substance of the letter. The timing and the atmosphere made discussion impossible, Arnn said, and the fraternity was told that if they would undo the letter by way of public apology, the administration would have more latitude to work with them. Arnn directed the fraternity members to work with Blackstock in the drafting of a letter. Over the next two weeks, two letters appeared in the Collegian, one addressed to Arnn (April 10) and another open letter of apology and retraction on the editorial page (April 17).
After the letters appeared, the fraternity members said they were hopeful they would be able to move forward with the administration and establish a normal situation in the house, without the new rules Petersen imposed in January. Blackstock, who had been brought into the conflict only weeks before, was working to solve the problem but needed more time. But the fraternity members' understanding was that they would have some of the rules and restrictions lifted upon issuing a public apology so they could conduct their usual pledge activities and end the year on a high note. When these expectations were not met, the members felt like they were being brushed aside. "We were crushed," Harrell said. "We had nothing. We were worse off than before and felt like we had been made to look like idiots by writing all these letters. We had been humiliated, and we were not operating as a house anymore."
As the academic year entered its final weeks, the fraternity and the administration were grid locked. Because the house had been able to conduct only one pledge event all semester on account of the new rules and restrictions, they decided to do one more event before the year ended. The event was to take place outside the house, so members thought it would not be a problem. The pledge activity itself, which took place over a 24-hour period, got out of control as pledges misunderstood the level of intensity with which the activity was to be conducted, members of the executive board said. A series of incidents occurred during this activity, including injuries from wrestling, public disturbances, a car accident, and the use of an electronic taser gun. When the administration learned about these things the next day, they immediately contacted the fraternity's national office, which sent Executive Vice President Jim Russell to Hillsdale to consult with the administration. Blackstock said evidence of physical hazing and repeated damage to the house forced the college, in cooperation with the Delta Tau Delta national office, to suspend the fraternity for the remainder of the year and shut down the house. All active members living in the house were compelled to move into college dormitories for the last week of classes and finals. Although the administration stressed that the past year's problems were not the deciding factor in suspending the fraternity and evicting the members from their house, many school officials believe that the institution had been failing for a number of years. "The conversation behind this has been going on since before I got here," Petersen said.
Petersen and Arnn also said that the house's pledge program had nothing to do with the national fraternity's pledge program, and that a series of traditions had developed in the house which were dangerous and out of step with the fraternity's creed.
But the executive board members said they thought everything was fine at the beginning of last year. Members were optimistic, the house was clean and in good repair, the overall grade-point average was up and the executive board was organized and ready to lead the house. After the suspension was announced in April, nearly all members of the fraternity deactivated, and remain so today. The entire saga of Hillsdale's Delta Tau Delta chapter underscores what the administration and many others see as a decline in the college's fraternity system. The suspension of Delta Tau Delta has coincided with new rules and regulations for all college fraternities as outlined in the Hillsdale College Fraternity Community standards, which go into effect this semester. Petersen said that the creation of the HCFC standards, which were drafted over the summer, was not done as a reaction to the suspension of Delta Tau Delta, but it did help to speed the process along and give it momentum. "As far as the fraternity community as a whole, the numbers show we are getting worse," Petersen said. "In the last 20 years we've gone from nearly 60 percent [of the student body] with six chapters to 17 percent with three chapters. We've been getting worse for some time now. The frat system on this campus is not growing, and if it's not growing, it's declining...There is going to be a lot of growing pains in the next couple of years." Although the college recognizes serious problems within Delta Tau Delta and the fraternity system as a whole, members of the administration say they are not trying to do away with certain houses, but that the college seeks to have a strong, healthy fraternity system. "We don't want to get rid of any of our [fraternity] houses," Blackstock said. "If we wanted to do away with the Delt House, all we would have to do is let it run its course and die. We want it to be strong and committed to the high principles in its creed and the mission statement of the college."
|
|
We explored the various sale options that we had and looked into alternative uses of the building. Nothing looked easy, cheap, or without a large time committment. Bids were solicited with the idea of sale to the highest bidder. A vote, at the January 1996 meeting, allowed that the College should be offered the opportunity for the right of last refusal in purchasing the house. Negotiations for the best price yielded $86,000 gross, with the house and land being taken over by the College. After paying off the mortgage and miscellaneous obligations, we netted approximately $65,000. In August 1996, the Iota Nu Chapter of Tau Kappa Epsilon Fraternity's House was torn down. |
![]()
Many of the Brothers have requested to know about what the events were that led to the
closing of the TKE Iota Nu chapter. Here, below, is the letter from Hillsdale College with the
summary of transgressions prepared by the Dean of Men's office: To: The Men of Tau Kappa Epsilon Effective December 15, 1995, Hillsdale College ceases recognition of the Iota Nu chapter of Tau Kappa Epsilon fraternity and revokes its charter to operate in any fashion on this campus. The revocation will stand until at least the spring semester of the year 2001. All members of your fraternity have until 5:00 p.m. on December 15, 1995 to vacate the chapter house and to remove all personal belongings. With the support of members of your Alumni Board and in cooperation with the Iota Nu chapter of Tau Kappa Epsilon Board of Directors, the house will be locked at that time and no one will be allowed to reenter. Members of your chapter, individually and collectively -- as appropriate, will be held financially and criminally responsible for any damabe to the house or grounds or illegal conduce subsequent to this decision. The chapter house must also be clean and orderly when it is vacated and the chapter is expected to pay all debts incurred this semester. All students currently living at TKE, except the three with the most hours, are required to move into a dormitory. Room assignments will be mailed tomorrow; those moving off campus must notify my office of their new phone number and address prior to registration for the spring 1996 semester. This decision was made in keeping with the "Institutional Guidelines re: Hillsdale College - Fraterity Relastionship" dated 9/23/83, under which all social fraternities and sororities operate. I take this action for two reasons: the first being excessive violations of the Hillsdale College policy, and the second being Iota Nu's long record of diciplinary problems and the current attitude which show no probability of improvement. An additional concern is that TKE has at times harmed the College's retlationship with parents and hindered our outreach and admissions efforts. According to "The Schedule of Sanctions for Violations Within The Greek System" a fourth violation is grounds for suspension of the chapter -- the Iota Nu chapter committed seven violations in a fifteen month period. In each disciplinary correspondence you were warned of the consequences of further violations and that ultimately the loss of your charter was possible. Your alumni warned you as well; yet the problems continued. The legacy of internal dissension and disciplinary problems at the Iota Nu chapter is well known. In the 1988-89 school year the dean of men handled 21 problems at TKE and in the 1987-88 school year he handled 22 problems at TKE. Other problems range from being place on diciplinary probation for social violations in the late 1980's, to numerous activities being dismissed for hazing pledges by playing Russian roulette in 1990, to a member firing a pistol in the basement in 1993 and social probation again in 1995. The college has been more than lenient and patient with the TKE. Those of us who have worked most closely with the chapter are now convinced that nothing more can be done and the chapter must be closed. Two weeks ago you submitted a mission statement and goals for the future as testament of a new era. Your document states as a goal, "Establish a positive rapport between ourselves and our community and administration based on mutual respect and open communications." As the saying goes, "actions speak louder than words". The day I received the "manifesto" I saw the new TKE T-shirt which boldly proclaims, Gentlemen, do not doubt the administration's resolve to complete this matter in a timely and reasonable manner. Falure to cooperate fully will jeopardize your enrollment at Hillsdale College and/or receipt of your transcripts or diploma.
Sincerely, |
|
TAU KAPPA EPSILON 12/4/95 (from Dean Coonradt) August 24, 1994 - TKE's host a mid-week keg party and are sanctioned. September 14, 1994 - TKE's hose a mid week keg party and are sanctioned. November, 1994 - TKE's host a mid week party prior to Thanksgiving and then deny the allegation. Local alumnus Dave Burgee intervenes and gets the TKE president to admit to the violation in private. I agree not to shaction the house, hoping that we could establish a new and positive relationship with the TKE leadership. February 18, 1995 - Parents, visiting their daughter on campus, saw a naked young man standing on the roof of the TKE front porch about 4:00 pm as two others were disrobing. This is the third violation or sanction and the chapter is banned from fall rush. May 13, 1995 - A group of graduation TKE's cemented a toilet to the commencment stage and urinated on it. Fortunately, Maintenance was able to remove it before the cement hardened. Summer, 1995 - The Dean of men received numerous phone calls from local businesses to whom the TKE house owed thousands of dollars. Summer, 1995 - The TKE house lawn was rarely mown and looked like a pasture. This created a negative image of the Hillsdale College for prospective students and donors as they visited the campus. August 19, 1995 - The Dean of Men received complaint of the TKE's, and I quote, "opening a bar on their front porch." The Dean drove past and saw two TKE's on the porch consuming alcohol and lining the porch railing with empty bottles and cans. While technically not a sanctionable violation, it created a poor image and demonstrates the TKE's disregard for the college. August 20, 1995 - TKE's host an unsanctioned party and campus security is asked to respond. Campus security cannot locate the female guests because TKE's have posted lookouts on the front porch to send warning when the Security approached. Reports indicate that a keg was located next door in the TKE "annex" and, from there, pitchers of beer were delivered to the chapter house. The new TKE president admitted to the party -- his honesty prevented the charter brom being revoked. Fall, 1995 - "Tar and feathering" of the eagle sculpture episode (later referred to as Eagle-Gate). The Dean o Men agreed not to punish the fraternity at-large if it was not a "chapter" effort and if the chapter cooperated fully with the investigation. The chapter, however, was deeply involved. The house served as a staging area for the vandalism, and in the aftermath, the chapter launched an organized obfuscation which far exceeded any cooperation.
|
